Sunday 26 May 2019

This Weeks Top 4 Prophetic Headlines from PNW


 
logo final
This Weeks Top 4 Prophetic Headlines
 
champ
 
Next Generation Warfare: From EMP To CHAMP
 
For years there has been warnings about the apocalyptic scenarios an EMP pulse blast could cause upon our nation. Now a new type of weapon has been deployed that eliminates the nuclear blast but keeps the devastating pulse that can fry all electronics.
 
 
Sponsored Content
 
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
 
sports
 
Christian Athletes Being Purged For Posting Biblical Beliefs On Social Media
 
In Australia, star rugby player Israel Folau has caused a national debate after being released from his team for posting Bible verses that condemn various sins including homosexuality and a call for repentance.
 
 
baby
 
Transgender Identity May Have Cost A Baby Its Life
 
When it comes to checking into a hospital, how you identify does not matter. What matters is your biology and trying to fight this reality can be deadly.
 
 
Sponsored ContentLearn more about RevenueStripe...
 
drought
 
Floods & Drought Devastate Crops Around The Planet - Global Food Crisis Coming?
 
It looks like global food production could be well below expectations in 2019, and that could spell big trouble in the months ahead.
 

Genocide of Christians Reaches "Alarming Stage"

In this mailing:
  • Raymond Ibrahim: Genocide of Christians Reaches "Alarming Stage"
  • Amir Taheri: Iran's Options and the Destructive Defiance

Genocide of Christians Reaches "Alarming Stage"

by Raymond Ibrahim  •  May 26, 2019 at 5:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • Many of the world's most persecuted Christians have nothing whatsoever to do with colonialism or missionaries. Those most faced with the threat of genocide — including Syria's and Iraq's Assyrians or Egypt's Copts — were Christian several centuries before the ancestors of Europe's colonizers became Christian and went missionizing
  • The BBC report highlights "political correctness" as being especially responsible for the West's indifference....
  • Among the worst persecutors are those that rule according to Islamic law, or Sharia -- which academics such as Georgetown University's John Esposito insist is equitable and just. In Afghanistan (ranked #2), "Christianity is not permitted to exist."
UK Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt (pictured) commissioned an "Independent Review into the global persecution of Christians," which was recently published. (Photo by Jack Taylor/Getty Images)
"Christian persecution 'at near genocide levels,'" the title of a May 3 BBC report, cites a lengthy interim study ordered by British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt and led by Rev. Philip Mounstephen, the Bishop of Truro.
According to the BBC report, one in three people around the world suffer from religious persecution, with Christians being "the most persecuted religious group". "Religion 'is at risk of disappearing' in some parts of the world, " it noted, and "In some regions, the level and nature of persecution is arguably coming close to meeting the international definition of genocide, according to that adopted by the UN."
British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt is also quoted on why Western governments have been "asleep" — his word — concerning this growing epidemic:

Iran's Options and the Destructive Defiance

by Amir Taheri  •  May 26, 2019 at 4:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • To start with, we must realize that the crisis in question isn't caused by any of the traditional causes of conflict between nation-states.... In other words, the conflict isn't a classical international one. The reason is that Iran no longer behaves as a nation-state but as a vehicle for an ideology.
  • The madness that is Khomeinism has always had its method, which includes abject surrender when pressed too hard and brazen aggression when pressure is eased.
  • Contrary to claims by the pro-mullah lobby in Washington, the choice isn't between surrender to Khomeminist madness and full-scale invasion of Iran. Only when the threshold of tolerable pain is reached the "Supreme Guide" may well reconsider his options. We are not there yet.
The madness that is Khomeinism has always had its method, which includes abject surrender when pressed too hard and brazen aggression when pressure is eased. There are signs that Iran's "Supreme Guide," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, may be contemplating what he has called "heroic flexibility". (Image source: kremlin.ru)
According to an old adage, every crisis also contains an opportunity. And the current crisis between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States may be no exception. Intense sabre-rattling on both sides, combined with what one might call "diplomacy of gesticulations," have reignited interest in what was a half-dormant conflict. That renewed interest could be used for persuading both sides, and others interested in the "Iran problem", to re-visit the root causes of the conflict. And, having done so, try to find realistic ways of defusing the situation.
But before that could be done, a number of steps must be taken.

Tens of Thousands Rally in Tel Aviv Against Netanyahu Immunity

Israel’s Muslim Ally Remains Bulwark on Iran Border; CLICK for Latest Israel News!
World Israel News
Tens of Thousands Rally in Tel Aviv Against Netanyahu Immunity
German Anti-Semitism Official Warns: Don't Wear Jewish Skullcaps
WATCH: Will America Go to War with Iran?

Through Revelation: Episode 4

Why is The New York Times Trying to Abort the Trump Peace Plan?

Why is The New York Times Trying to Abort the Trump Peace Plan?

by Alan M. Dershowitz  •  May 24th 
  • No one ever lost money betting against peace between Israelis and Palestinians.... It would be far better if The New York Times waited until the plan was released and then commented on its specific provisions rather than stacking the deck against it by quoting only its most strident critics.
  • There are those who will criticize any plan, no matter how positive it may be, if it emanates from the Trump administration. When President Trump moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights, many Democrats who would have favored such moves if they had been done by Barack Obama, opposed them only because these same moves were done by President Trump. These Democrats do not want to see Trump succeed at anything, even if his success would be good for America, for Israel and for peace.
  • If the editors of The New York Times refuse to separate opinion and analysis from hard reporting, every reader has an obligation to make that separation for herself or himself. Bear this in mind when you read The New York Times.
The New York Times seems determined to kill the proposed Trump Middle East peace plan before it is even made public. In the guise of news, the Times provided "analysis" in the news section, which was, in reality, an editorial. Readers must be wary.... (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
The New York Times seems determined to kill the proposed Trump Middle East peace plan before it is even made public. In a recent article, it quoted only nay-sayers and critics, who without having even seen the plan have declared its demise. In the guise of news, the Times provided "analysis" in the news section, which was, in reality, an editorial. This has become more and more common on the news pages of The New York Times. The separation of news from opinion is in the highest tradition of journalism, but The New York Times seems determined to knock down that wall of separation, especially when it comes to subjects on which its editors and publishers have strong opinions. Among these subjects are both Israel, which can do no right, and Donald Trump, who is always wrong. When these two subjects come together, as they do with regard to the Trump peace plan, readers must be wary of accepting news reports as objective.

Palestinians: The New Hamas List of 'Traitors'

by Khaled Abu Toameh  •  May 24th 
  • One of the Arabs who have dared to speak the truth about Hamas and Islamic Jihad is Nadim Koteich, a prominent Lebanese journalist, who recently accused Islamic Jihad of starting the last round of fighting with Israel.
  • In an interview with the Lebanese LDC TV channel, Koteich said that Hamas and Islamic Jihad, representing the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran respectively, should have turned the Gaza Strip after Israel's withdrawal in 2005 into an opportunity for a national Palestinian compromise.
  • Instead, he said, the two groups have "thwarted all opportunities for peace" and have ended up in a prison called Gaza."
  • Such voices from some Palestinians and Arabs are a sign they may have finally woken up to realize that Palestinian leaders, particularly Hamas and Islamic Jihad, are leading their people towards the abyss. If the voices of the critics grow, then there will be hope that one day the extremist camp among the Palestinians will be weakened.
The Palestinian Hamas movement that rules the Gaza Strip has never tolerated any form of criticism. Hamas claims that Palestinian Authority and Fatah leaders who dare to speak out against it are "traitors" and "collaborators" working with the "Zionist enemy." Pictured: Masked Hamas gunmen in the Gaza Strip. (Image source: Abid Katib/Getty Images)
The Palestinian Hamas movement that rules the Gaza Strip has never tolerated any form of criticism. It does not accept any criticism from Palestinians living under its rule in the Gaza Strip. It does not accept any criticism from its rivals in the Palestinian Authority (PA) and its ruling Fatah faction. It certainly does not accept any criticism from Israel or the United States.
Now, Hamas is saying that it does not tolerate any criticism from Arabs. Hamas claims that Palestinian Authority and Fatah leaders who dare to speak out against it are "traitors" and "collaborators" working with the "Zionist enemy."
Arab media personalities who recently criticized Hamas and its allies in the Gaza Strip have now been placed on its list of "traitors" and "collaborators."

Thursday 23 May 2019

False Teacher Beth Moore Wants To Tear Down Biblical Womanhood And ‘Throw Off The Shackles’ Of The Apostle Paul’s Commands On The Operation Of The New Testament Church

New post on Now The End Begins

False Teacher Beth Moore Wants To Tear Down Biblical Womanhood And ‘Throw Off The Shackles’ Of The Apostle Paul’s Commands On The Operation Of The New Testament Church

by Geoffrey Grider

Then, in typical Beth Moore fashion, she claims she had an “experience” that changed the way she thought about Christianity — that led her to these conclusions.

Beth Moore starts her diatribe against biblical womanhood as follows and ascribing her unbiblical position to the Holy Spirit. In case you weren’t aware, that’s blasphemy.

Beth Moore is another one of the many end times female false teachers who are really motivational speakers who really want to be preachers who really want to be men. She started out innocently enough, teaching the bible to women, then somewhere along the way, she changed. Drastically. In 2019, we find her leading a full-on frontal assault on both biblical womanhood and what the Bible says is the role for women who want to serve in the church to play. She has gotten so bad, in fact, that we have made her a full-time resident of the Church at Laodicea.
"Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." 1 Timothy 2:11-14 (KJV)
So what has led Beth Moore straight down the path to apostasy? Well, one of the reasons that is instantly obvious is that Beth Moore has an 'experienced-based belief' in the word of God. That is to say that she only believes what the Bible teaches until it runs up against something she has experienced in her life. Then she changes her view on the Bible to match what her experience has showed her.
For example, oftentimes someone who believes what the Bible says about homosexuality being a sin will change that stance when a close friend or a loved one comes out as gay. This is how Beth Moore operates her 'ministry'. She lets her life experiences determine what she will and will not follow about the Bible, when in fact, a Christian does just the opposite. A Christian conforms their beliefs around the Bible, and not the Bible around their beliefs like she does.
What Beth Moore is fundamentally (pardon the intentional pun) preaching is secular feminism through a #MeToo style filter. She wants women in the pulpit on a Sunday morning, just like men do, and she wants to tear down the 'men in power' as she does it. In short, Beth Moore is a full-fledged heretic who is looking more and more like she isn't even saved. Follow her at your own peril.

In typical Beth Moore fashion, she claims she had an “experience” that changed the way she thought about Christianity — that led her to these conclusions.

FROM REFORMATION CHARLOTTE: If you’re an Evangelical — particularly a Southern Baptist — you could very well be familiar with Beth Moore’s recent tirade against Biblical womanhood. If not, you should read up on it as she’s arguably the most influential woman in all of Evangelicalism. While the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) has historically held to complementarianism — that is, the biblical position that God created man and woman equal in status with differing gender roles — many Southern Baptists are now calling for a revolution.
Painting biblical complementarianism as “sexist” and those who hold to it as “power hungry,” Beth Moore doubles — triples down on her rebellion and essentially, just like the serpent in the Garden of Eden, asks “did God really say?”
She starts her diatribe against biblical womanhood as follows and ascribing her unbiblical position to the Holy Spirit. In case you weren’t aware, that’s blasphemy.
Here is where she acknowledges that the Bible actually tells her she’s not allowed to preach, especially from the pulpit, and definitely especially on Sunday mornings to the congregation — yet, she questions it. She wants it to not say what it actually says. This is Satanic at its core, asserting that it’s sexist, power-hungry men who disagree with her preaching.
Then, in typical Beth Moore fashion, she claims she had an “experience” that changed the way she thought about Christianity — that led her to these conclusions. Notice that it wasn’t biblical instruction that led her to think this way — it was her feminist worldview.
And finally, she declares that no matter what, she will continue in her rebellion against God until she dies, and if the SBC won’t allow her, she’ll go somewhere else that will.
And as an added bonus, the gay-affirming feminist lady-preacher, Jen Hatmaker calls Beth Moore a prophet. A prophet. That should speak volumes in and of itself.

What Is Biblical Womanhood?

You may or may not have heard of the term biblical womanhood, so here is a good definition from GotQuestions.
Biblical womanhood is the distinguishing character of a woman as defined by the Bible. When God created two genders (Genesis 1:275:2Matthew 19:4), He also instituted different roles for each gender. He designed the bodies and brains of men and women to work differently and to fulfill complementary roles. A man does not need to act like a woman because he can never be a woman. He can never process information like a woman, because his brain, his DNA, and his entire being are male. The same is true for women trying to be men. READ MORE

Palestinians: The New Hamas List of 'Traitors'

In this mailing:
  • Khaled Abu Toameh: Palestinians: The New Hamas List of 'Traitors'
  • Majid Rafizadeh: Iran: Planning to Kidnap and Kill More Americans

Palestinians: The New Hamas List of 'Traitors'

by Khaled Abu Toameh  •  May 23, 2019 at 5:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • One of the Arabs who have dared to speak the truth about Hamas and Islamic Jihad is Nadim Koteich, a prominent Lebanese journalist, who recently accused Islamic Jihad of starting the last round of fighting with Israel.
  • In an interview with the Lebanese LDC TV channel, Koteich said that Hamas and Islamic Jihad, representing the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran respectively, should have turned the Gaza Strip after Israel's withdrawal in 2005 into an opportunity for a national Palestinian compromise.
  • Instead, he said, the two groups have "thwarted all opportunities for peace" and have ended up in a prison called Gaza."
  • Such voices from some Palestinians and Arabs are a sign they may have finally woken up to realize that Palestinian leaders, particularly Hamas and Islamic Jihad, are leading their people towards the abyss. If the voices of the critics grow, then there will be hope that one day the extremist camp among the Palestinians will be weakened.
The Palestinian Hamas movement that rules the Gaza Strip has never tolerated any form of criticism. Hamas claims that Palestinian Authority and Fatah leaders who dare to speak out against it are "traitors" and "collaborators" working with the "Zionist enemy." Pictured: Masked Hamas gunmen in the Gaza Strip. (Image source: Abid Katib/Getty Images)
The Palestinian Hamas movement that rules the Gaza Strip has never tolerated any form of criticism. It does not accept any criticism from Palestinians living under its rule in the Gaza Strip. It does not accept any criticism from its rivals in the Palestinian Authority (PA) and its ruling Fatah faction. It certainly does not accept any criticism from Israel or the United States.
Now, Hamas is saying that it does not tolerate any criticism from Arabs. Hamas claims that Palestinian Authority and Fatah leaders who dare to speak out against it are "traitors" and "collaborators" working with the "Zionist enemy."
Arab media personalities who recently criticized Hamas and its allies in the Gaza Strip have now been placed on its list of "traitors" and "collaborators."

Iran: Planning to Kidnap and Kill More Americans

by Majid Rafizadeh  •  May 23, 2019 at 4:00 am
Facebook  Twitter  Addthis  Send  Print
  • A leading Republican lawmaker, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), also the ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has pointed out that recent intelligence obtained about Iran's threat was extremely detailed.
  • These are simply preemptive measures that any rational state would take in the face of those clear threats. They were being taken to save the lives of American citizens and prevent the world's official leading state sponsor of terrorism from destabilizing the region.
  • What do critics of the Trump administration expect the American government to do...? Do these critics want the Trump administration to ignore Iran and its terror groups until another terrorist act like 9/11 occurs? Or is it possible that these critics, deep-down, do not care about U.S. national security and the lives of ordinary citizens?
According to leaked reports, Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Quds Force, the elite branch of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), recently traveled to Iraq and instructed the leaders of Iraqi Shiite militia groups, which operate under the name Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), to "prepare for proxy war". Pictured: Iraqi PMF militia commanders with Iranian advisors during Hawija offensive in Iraq, on September 27, 2017. (Image source: VOA video screenshot/Wikimedia Commons)
While plans were being concocted to harm or murder Americans, it is mind-boggling that people -- even entire governments -- were criticizing the Trump administration for preparing preemptive measures against multiple credible threats from the Iranian government and its forces.
While people were squabbling over the choices the Trump administration was making, the Iranian leaders, known to have mastered conducting asymmetric warfare, were giving directives to kidnap and kill American soldiers.
A leading Republican lawmaker, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), also the ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has pointed out that recent intelligence obtained about Iran's threat was extremely detailed.
"To the extent I can discuss it, it was human intelligence," he said, and added that, "One of the Hezbollah cells is known for its kidnapping and killing operations, and their directive was to go in and kill and kidnap American soldiers."